top of page
Search

KFC Left Pepsi After 40 Years. A Week Later, Taco Bell Signed On Through 2036

Writer: Nguyễn Phi Vân
Nguyễn Phi Vân
7 hours ago
3 min read

On October 15, KFC said it will move its roughly 3,700 U.S. restaurants from Pepsi to Coca-Cola, starting in January 2027 and finishing by spring. That ends a beverage relationship that began in 1986, when PepsiCo bought KFC, and survived the 1997 spin-off into Yum Brands.

One week later, on October 22, Taco Bell - KFC's sister brand under the same Yum roof - went the other way. It extended its PepsiCo partnership by 11 years, through 2036, across the U.S., Canada, Thailand, Ireland and the UK.

Same parent company. Same supplier. Opposite decisions, seven days apart. For anyone building or buying into a franchise system, that is the real headline.

What Is Actually Happening Here

The two deals are not a contradiction. They are two brands pricing the same supplier against very different needs.

Taco Bell has spent years co-creating products with PepsiCo. Mountain Dew Baja Blast is now a USD 1 billion brand. Doritos Locos Tacos became a signature item, followed by Cool Ranch and Flamin' Hot versions, Baja Midnight, even a Baja Blast gelato. The renewal points to the next chapter: crafted, functional and energy drinks aimed at Gen Z, plus new morning and afternoon occasions.

When a supplier relationship has produced menu items customers ask for by name, walking away is not a procurement decision. It is a brand decision.

KFC's situation is different. Its president, Catherine Tan-Gillespie, has described the brand as "loved but latent," and the switch sits inside a comeback plan that includes refreshed marketing, new value offers, returning items and a bigger beverage lineup in its new Open House prototype. A brand that needs new energy can use a supplier change as part of that story. And notably, KFC keeps PepsiCo as its beverage partner in international markets. The switch is U.S. only.

Why It Matters

Three lessons sit underneath these headlines.

First, supply contracts are set brand by brand and market by market, not group-wide. Even inside one parent company, each brand negotiated for its own position. Even inside one brand, KFC split its decision by geography.

Second, co-created products change who holds the leverage. A pouring contract for a commodity soda is easy to replace. A co-developed product with its own fan base is not. If your brand helped build a supplier's product, you have something to bring to the next negotiation, and you also have something you might lose if you leave.

Third, a supplier deal is also a guest-experience and margin decision that lands on franchisees. Beverages touch menu price, promotional support, equipment and training in every unit. The headline belongs to the franchisor. The changeover work belongs to the people running the restaurants.

For Brands Going Global

Look closely at Taco Bell's map: the U.S., Canada, Thailand, Ireland and the UK. That is not a "worldwide" clause. It is a named list of markets.

For brands expanding into Asia, including Vietnamese and Southeast Asian concepts going abroad, this is the practical point. A global supplier may be strong in one market and weak in the next. Distribution, local pricing and marketing support vary by country. Signing one master supply agreement and assuming it fits every new territory is how brands end up with a contract that works at home and pinches overseas.

Five Things to Do This Quarter

  • List every strategic supplier in your system and write down which brand, which markets and which end date each contract covers. Many franchisors cannot answer this in one page.

  • Identify any product you co-created with a supplier. Clarify in writing who owns the recipe, the name and the right to keep selling it if the relationship ends.

  • Before any renewal, ask what the supplier gives back beyond price: product development, marketing funds, equipment, training, local distribution in your next market.

  • Bring franchisees into the conversation early. Ask how a change would affect their menu pricing, equipment and staff training, and agree on who pays for the transition.

  • For each new country, check whether your existing supply deal really covers it, or whether you need a separate market-level agreement.

KFC and Taco Bell show that the same supplier can be the right partner for one brand and the wrong one for its sibling. The skill is not loyalty or switching. It is knowing exactly what each contract is worth to your brand, in each market.

Negotiate your supply deals the way you negotiate territory: one brand, one market, one clear end date at a time.

This article is for general information only and is not legal or financial advice.

Sources:

Comments

 You have successfully subscribed!

Enter email and hit subscribe to receive my new posts automatically via email

©2021 by Nguyễn Phi Vân

bottom of page